The controversy behind copyright

It has been under debate whether copyright does harm or brings good to us. Theoretically speaking, copyright acts as a catalyst for the protection of intellectual property such as computer programs, music, sound recordings, films, literary and artistic works. In Australia, copyright is automatically applied to any work that is an original creation and not a duplication.
Speaking of the positive aspects, under copyright protection, owners can prevent others from reproducing, remaking or remixing their work without obtaining their permission and from selling these rights to the others. It is obvious that nobody who makes a living out of writing or composing music wants to have their works copied for profit. Besides, if you have an original idea of creative work, it possibly ends up having substantial value in the long term and may even potentially bring financial benefits.
On the other hand, copyright is believed to act as an obstacle to creativity. In reality, copyright is supposed to be a tool of supporting creativity at first. The issue, it turns out, is the main features of copyright seem to be straight against creativity. As I mentioned before in my last blog, copyright prevents remix culture from growing. Thus remixing has barely opportunities to go viral. Take Vietnamese singer Son Tung MTP as an example. He is a very popular Vietnamese pop singer with catchy songs composed by himself. However, recently there has been some scandals around him relating to plagiarism and copyright violation. Though there are several beats and rhythms believed to be quite similar to those of US-UK songs, there has been no evidence of him ‘stealing’ others’ artworks. Even if there is, does it mean that copyright just prevents talented people from remixing creative, quality products?
Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 3.32.45 am.png
Furthermore, the current laws are suggested to be outdated in the digital age. In reality, copyright laws interfere with the process of filesharing between individuals on social media. Imagining there are some moments you would like to share with your friends and family but you are prohibited from doing so due to copyright; or when you film a video of your journey and you want to put some music in the background but it means you violate music copyright, how are these things bothering you?
No matter what copyright influences, I believe the laws would still function well in the society. Anyway, copyright guarantees owners’ rights on their products. From my personal perspective, I think it is not the copyright laws that are to blame but it is high time governments loosen the policy of copyright so as to make the most of it.
What do you think about this? Let me know your opinions by commenting below! Thank you!
source.gif
Featured Image Source
Preference list:
‘1.1 What is copyright?’, Smartcopying, <http://www.smartcopying.edu.au/copyright-guidelines/copyright—a-general-overview/1-1-what-is-copyright->, viewed 25 April 2017
‘Three reasons for copyright protection’, British Library, UK, <https://www.bl.uk/business-and-ip-centre/articles/three-reasons-for-copyright-protection>, viewed 25 April 2017
Zeqr, ‘Why is copyright good?’, Quora, <https://www.quora.com/Why-is-copyright-good>, viewed 25 April 2017
Dan Hunter, ‘Why cash and copyright are bad news for creativity’, The Conversation, 5 January 2015, <https://theconversation.com/why-cash-and-copyright-are-bad-news-for-creativity-34696>, viewed 25 April 2017
Paul Samael, ‘COPYRIGHT – IS IT A BAD THING?’, weblog, 20 August 2013, <http://paulsamael.com/blog/copyright-is-it-a-bad-thing->, viewed 25 April 2017
Do copyright laws do more harm than good?’, debate.org, <http://www.debate.org/opinions/do-copyright-laws-do-more-harm-than-good>, viewed 25 April 2017
Pop singer accused of Charlie Puth plagiarism’, Vietnamnet, 7 August 2016, <http://english.vietnamnet.vn/fms/art-entertainment/161729/pop-singer-accused-of-charlie-puth-plagiarism.html>, viewed 25 April 2017
Advertisements

2 comments

  1. I love your post about copyrights its interesting to look at other people’s views and ideas around it compared to my own. It is true that it is debatable whether copyright does harm or brings good to us. I like the way you look at it and it is interesting how it varies from country to country. As you put you put it Theoretically copyrights acts as a catalyst for the protection of intellectual property such as computer programs, music, sound recordings, films, literary and artistic works. And it true I also find your MEME and choice of examples interesting and useful.

    Like

  2. I definitely believe you are correct. Copyright laws are gradually becoming outdated in the current online connected world in which we live. Another example could be the ‘Blurred Lines’ song by Pharrell & Robin Thicke and their copyright case with Marvin Gaye. Otherwise your example is great, along with your GIF to conclude. I do agree with you that people are entitled to protect what they create, and for now these laws must stay in place, but how much longer will they last?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s